USPTO serial 74029331
QUADRANT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STINE, DAVID
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with QUADRANT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Nr. Milnthorpe, Cumbria, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
J. Georg Seka
J GEORG SEKA TOWNSEND AND TOWNSENDONE MARKET STSTEUART ST TWRSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | machines and apparatus, namely a wheeled chassis, to be used to carry construction equipment such as air compressors, electrical generators, electric motors, arc welding equipment, centrifugal pumps, electric pumps, screw augers and the like; air compressors; electrical generators; electric motors; arc welding equipment; centrifugal pumps; electric pumps; screw augers; internal combustion engines; and replacement and structural parts for all the aforesaid goods | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 3, 1997 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 7, 1996 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 11, 1995 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jul 12, 1995 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 10, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 18, 1994 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 4, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 5, 1993 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 1, 1992 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 4, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 2, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 9, 1991 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 29, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 24, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 17, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |