USPTO serial 74029583
NEWPORT COAST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KREBS, CATHERINE K.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NEWPORT COAST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Newport Beach, CA
Newport Beach, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert F. Scoular
ROBERT F SCOULAR SONNENSCHEIN, NATH AND ROSENTHAL601 S FIGUEROA STSTE 1500LOS ANGELES, CA 90017-5704Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 039 | transportation of passengers by limousine and motor coach | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | resort hotel services, restaurant services, art gallery services, and retail store services in the field of bakery goods, beauty salon, books, cameras, candy, clothing, florist, grocery, gifts, jewelry, music and record, pets, pharmacy, photography, and home videos; and department store services | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 4, 1994 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 25, 1994 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 3, 1994 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Oct 18, 1993 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 2, 1993 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 26, 1993 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 3, 1993 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 12, 1992 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 12, 1992 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 3, 1992 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 3, 1992 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 15, 1992 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 2, 1992 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 3, 1991 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 11, 1991 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 11, 1991 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 28, 1991 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 11, 1991 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 2, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |