USPTO serial 74029930
DRESSED TO GO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DRESSED TO GO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Richmond, British Columbia, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
C. Ronald Riches
C RONALD RICHES COASTAL TRADEMARK SERVICESP O BOX 12109700-555 W HASTINGS STVANCOUVER, BC V6B 4N6Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | take out prepared poultry foods namely chicken kievs, schnitzel, cordon bleu, ballottines, roulades, marinated chiken assorted varieties, satay sticks, brochettes, stir fry, rissoles (meatballs), whole chicken, chicken parts, cornish hens, quail, goose, pheasant, turkey, gourmet suasages, pates, terrines, chicken nuggets, chicken fingers, chicken burger patties, minced chicken, chicken wellington, philo pastry with assorted fillings, chicken pies, stuffed whole boneless chicken, sausage rolls, eggs, sauces, marinades, seasonings, chicken stocks | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | operation of a retail food store featuring fresh and prepared poultry and game birds, both by the part of whole | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 1, 1991 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 25, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 1, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |