Drawing for UPS-ABLE KD FOUNDATION

USPTO serial 74030008

UPS-ABLE KD FOUNDATION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
EVANKO, PATRICIA MALESARDI
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with UPS-ABLE KD FOUNDATION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Richard O. Bartz

RICHARD O BARTZ BURD, BARTZ & GUTENKAUF1300 FOSHAY TWRMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
020foundations for bedsABANDONEDAug 1, 1989

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 3, 1995EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Apr 25, 1995ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 1, 1992ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Aug 20, 1992CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 30, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 9, 1992CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Mar 24, 1992JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 28, 1992CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 22, 1991CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 2, 1991JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Sep 6, 1991CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 31, 1991ZZZZALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jul 22, 1991CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 16, 1991DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 27, 1991CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 28, 1991CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 14, 1990CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 28, 1990CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 1, 1990DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance