USPTO serial 74030203
FRANKENMUTH VALLEY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 10, 2005
- Examiner
- MULLEN, MARK
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with FRANKENMUTH VALLEY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Frankenmuth Fundraising Corporation
Frankenmuth, MI
Other trademarks owned by Frankenmuth Fundraising Corporation
Frankenmuth Fundraising Corporation
Frankenmuth, MI
Other trademarks owned by Frankenmuth Fundraising Corporation
Frankenmuth Fundraising Corporation
Frankenmuth, MI
Other trademarks owned by Frankenmuth Fundraising Corporation
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ian C. McLeod
JEFFERY A HANDELMAN BRINKS, HOFER, GILSON & LIONEP O BOX 10395CHICAGO, IL 60610UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Frankenmuth Fundraising Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Frankenmuth Fundraising Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Frankenmuth Fundraising Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named FRANKENMUTH VALLEY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 16, 2011 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 10, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 11, 2005 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 11, 2005 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 13, 1995 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 30, 1995 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 8, 1995 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 7, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 20, 1995 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 27, 1995 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 14, 1995 | EXPR | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL REVERSED | — |
| Feb 8, 1994 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 23, 1993 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 16, 1993 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 15, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 14, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 26, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 14, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 30, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 30, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 9, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 20, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 19, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 1, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 30, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 8, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 21, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 14, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 4, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |