USPTO serial 74030382
SNACK SMART
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BATTLE, KENNETH
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SNACK SMART?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James C. Wood
JAMES C WOOD WOOD, PHILLIPS, MASON, ET ALNORTHWESTERN ATRIUM CTR STE 3800500 W MADISON STCHICAGO, IL 60661-2511Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | prepared snacks; namely, toasted wheat, toasted wheat with oats, toasted wheat with sunflower meats, honey roasted wheat, honey roasted wheat with oats, honey roasted wheat with sunflower meats, roasted wheat, roasted wheat with oats and roasted wheat with sunflower meats | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 15, 1993 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 14, 1993 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 14, 1993 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 16, 1992 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 25, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 24, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 6, 1992 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 11, 1991 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 12, 1991 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 22, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 22, 1991 | IURF | IU INFORMAL RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 9, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 3, 1991 | IUFF | USE AFFIDAVIT FAILED FORMALITIES | — |
| Jun 5, 1991 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 22, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 1, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 31, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 21, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 4, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |