Drawing for BRUCE

USPTO serial 74030470

BRUCE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SHAW, THOMAS V
Law office
OFFICE OF THE SOLICITOR

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BRUCE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Alan H. Levine

ALAN H LEVINE FIDDLER & LEVINEEMPIRE STATE BLDG STE 7814350 FIFTH AVENEW YORK, NY 10118

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
002stain for wood flooring; wood filler for filling nicks, scratches, and cracks in wood flooringABANDONEDJul 28, 1989
003touch-up kits for wood flooring containing sandpaper, stain impregnated cloth, and scrub padABANDONED—
020protector pads for use on furniture bottoms to protect wood floorsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 28, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 14, 1992ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Feb 26, 1992EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Dec 5, 1991CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 1, 1991UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 14, 1991CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Oct 18, 1990CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 12, 1990CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance