USPTO serial 74030606
FRANKENMUTH HERITAGE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MULLEN, MARK
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FRANKENMUTH HERITAGE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ian C. McLeod
JEROME GILSON BRINKS HOFER GILSON LIONEPO BOX 10395CHICAGO, IL 60610UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Frankenmuth Fundraising Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Frankenmuth Fundraising Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named FRANKENMUTH HERITAGE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 1, 2005 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 1, 2005 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 1, 2005 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 11, 2005 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 15, 1996 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 23, 1996 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 26, 1996 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 23, 1996 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 20, 1995 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 27, 1995 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 14, 1995 | EXPR | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL REVERSED | — |
| Feb 8, 1994 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 9, 1993 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 12, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 12, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 23, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 5, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 23, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 11, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 24, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 18, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 21, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 14, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 1, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 22, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 12, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 25, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 6, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 21, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 7, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |