USPTO serial 74030819
PACIFIC FLAVORS INTERNATIONAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 14, 1992
- Examiner
- QUINN, JULIE CLINTON
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with PACIFIC FLAVORS INTERNATIONAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Santa Fe Springs, CA
Santa Fe Springs, CA
Santa Fe Springs, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stephan P. Gribok
STEPHAN P GRIBOK STEELE, GOULD & FRIEDSTE 3232 1700 MARKET STPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | food flavoring concentrate extracts (being essential oils) and fragrances for domestic use | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 17, 1991 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 18, 1999 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 14, 1992 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 13, 1992 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| May 5, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 21, 1992 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 2, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 20, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 29, 1992 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 29, 1992 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 13, 1991 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 13, 1991 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 9, 1991 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 16, 1991 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 15, 1991 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 9, 1991 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 6, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 1, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 8, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |