USPTO serial 74031083
AROGLIDE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SUSSMAN, RONALD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AROGLIDE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Daniel W. McDonald
DANIEL W MCDONALD MERCHANT, GOULD, SMITH, EDELL, ET AL3100 NORWEST CTR90 S SEVENTH STMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | machines for handling mail, including letters and packages, for purposes of delivery by or to postal services and mail delivery services; mail processing and sorting equipment and parts thereof | ABANDONED | — |
| 009 | electric, electronic and optical instruments for handling and sorting packages and goods and mail, comprising computers, computer programs, magnetic disks and tapes, weighing machines and parts thereof | ABANDONED | — |
| 016 | training and instruction manuals used in connection with machines for handling of packaged goods and mail, mail processing and sorting equipment and computer software for controlling such machines, filing trays, printed cards, maps, paper tapes and cards for the recordal of computer programs and data, stamps, and postcards | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 28, 1996 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 20, 1996 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 27, 1996 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 30, 1995 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 27, 1995 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 23, 1995 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 10, 1995 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 27, 1994 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 5, 1994 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 15, 1993 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Aug 31, 1993 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 26, 1991 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 25, 1991 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 6, 1991 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 1, 1991 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 24, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 6, 1990 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 15, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 29, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |