USPTO serial 74031322
TEV/FLEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FINE, STEVEN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TEV/FLEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Richelieu, Quebec, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James E. Shlesinger
JAMES E SHLESINGER SHLESINGER & MYERS3000 S EADS STARLINGTON, VA 22202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | dump truck liners and mud flaps, all made of polyethylene plastic sheet material | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 27, 1994 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| May 11, 1993 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| May 11, 1993 | PRRD | PETITION RECONSIDERATION REQUEST DENIED | — |
| May 11, 1993 | PRRD | PETITION RECONSIDERATION REQUEST DENIED | — |
| Jan 6, 1993 | PRRR | PETITION RECONSIDERATION REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 6, 1993 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 7, 1992 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Feb 26, 1992 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 24, 1992 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 9, 1991 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 24, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 23, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |