USPTO serial 74031391
SUNWATCH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KING, CHRISTINA B
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SUNWATCH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
DONALD D. DORITY, J. STEPHEN HUNTER AND TERRY R. ALLEN
Willowdale, Ontario, CA
Other trademarks owned by DONALD D. DORITY, J. STEPHEN HUNTER AND TERRY R. ALLEN
Willowdale, Ontario, CA
Willowdale, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph S. Littenberg
JOSEPH S LITTENBERG LERNER, DAVID, LITTENBERG, ET AL600 S AVE WWESTFIELD, NJ 07090UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | wristwatch device which measures exposure from sunlight | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by DONALD D. DORITY, J. STEPHEN HUNTER AND TERRY R. ALLEN
- Other trademarks owned by SUNWATCH, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by SUNWATCH, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named SUNWATCH
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 30, 1995 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 30, 1995 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 30, 1995 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 6, 1992 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 21, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 20, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 29, 1991 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 18, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 11, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 1991 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 17, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 23, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 19, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 25, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |