Drawing for SATELLITE HOME THEATER

USPTO serial 74031404

SATELLITE HOME THEATER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HERSHKOWITZ, MERYL
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SATELLITE HOME THEATER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David M. Silverman, Esq.

DAVID M SILVERMAN ESQ COLE, RAYWID & BRAVERMAN1919 PENNSYLVANIA AVE N WSTE 200WASHINGTON, DC 20006

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016magazines relating to home, video and audio entertainmentABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 1, 1993EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 25, 1993ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Feb 24, 1993EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Nov 19, 1992CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Nov 6, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 10, 1992CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 10, 1991REINREINSTATED—
Feb 11, 1991ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 19, 1990CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 20, 1990CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 4, 1990DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance