Drawing for QTRONIX INNOVATION & INTEGRATION

USPTO serial 74031458

QTRONIX INNOVATION & INTEGRATION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MANVILLE, ANNA W.
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with QTRONIX INNOVATION & INTEGRATION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Thomas J. Moore

THOMAS J MOORE BACON & THOMAS625 SLATERS LNFOURTH FLALEXANDRIA, VA 22314

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer peripherals, namely, capacitive keyboard, lap top keyboard, keyboard, mouse, keyboard provided with mouse, trackball, scanner, video graphic array card, mechanical keyboard, and both internal and external tape backup systems comprising a tape driver, control card and cableABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 5, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 3, 1992ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 2, 1992EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 14, 1991EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Apr 3, 1991DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 15, 1991CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 24, 1990CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 13, 1990CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 1, 1990DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 12, 1990CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance