USPTO serial 74031753
BEST VALUE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FICKES, JERI J
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BEST VALUE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Donald A. Kaul
DONALD A KAUL BROWNSTEIN ZEIDMAN AND SCHOMERSTE 9001401 NEW YORK AVE N WWASHINGTON, DC 20005Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | bleach and laundry aids; namely, detergents, dry and liquid; dish detergent; fabric softener; polishes; soap bar; and soap pads; laundry starch; cleaning products; namely, cleansers; glass cleansers; motor oil; sanitary napkins; personal deodorants | ABANDONED | — |
| 004 | charcoal briquettes | ABANDONED | — |
| 005 | air freshners; ammonia for cleaning purposes | ABANDONED | — |
| 006 | aluminum foil | ABANDONED | — |
| 021 | JARS | ABANDONED | — |
| 029 | dried beans; fish; processed nuts; food oils; pickles, olives; salad dressing; apple and cranberry sauces; shortening; canned soups; soup and dried bouillon; tuna fish; tomato products; namely, cooked, canned and processed tomatos; tomato paste and tomato puree; dried fruits; canned fruits; jellies and fruit preserves; canned meats; milk; coffee creamer; peanut butter; mayonnaise | ABANDONED | — |
| 030 | bakery goods; bread crumbs; processed breakfast cereals; cake mixes; candy; hot cereals; ground coffee; instant coffee; cookies; dessert puddings; pancake mixes; pancake syrups; pie crust mixes; fruit pie fillings; flour; rice and rice mixes; spaghetti and macaroni; spaghetti sauces; freezer ice pops; vinegar; tea bags; spices; bread-based; stuffing and mixes; sugar; tea mixes; frostings; taco shells; ketchup and mustard | ABANDONED | — |
| 031 | bird food; cat food; cat litter; dog food; fresh vegetables | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Aster Nut Products, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 004
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 031
- Similar marks named BEST VALUE
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 30, 1993 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 23, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 19, 1991 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 11, 1991 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 1991 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 21, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 30, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 21, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 21, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 25, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 14, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |