USPTO serial 74032183
THE BOND BUYER'S MUNICIPAL MARKETPLACE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 607
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HANKIN, NANCY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THE BOND BUYER'S MUNICIPAL MARKETPLACE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael S. Harris
MICHAEL S HARRIS THOMSON INFORMATION/PUBLISHING GROUPONE STATION PLSTAMFORD, CT 06902UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | directory of bond dealers, bond credit enhancers, finance consultants, bond attorneys, government officials, industry associates, regulators and information and technology service companies in the securities market | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 8, 1994 | PCDE | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DENIED | — |
| Nov 24, 1993 | IUFF | USE AFFIDAVIT FAILED FORMALITIES | — |
| Sep 24, 1993 | ABN7 | ABANDONMENT - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT | — |
| Sep 3, 1993 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 23, 1993 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 29, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 27, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 29, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 27, 1992 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 29, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 19, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 15, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 16, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 1, 1991 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 1, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 17, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 7, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |