USPTO serial 74032285
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph G. Nauman
JOSEPH G NAUMAN BIEBEL, FRENCH & NAUMAN2500 KETTERING TWRDAYTON, OH 45423UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | QUALITY ASSURANCE MANUALS DEALING WITH TOOLING FOR MANUFACTURING PRESSES | ABANDONED | Jan 24, 1990 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 8, 1991 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 27, 1991 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 27, 1991 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 15, 1991 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 9, 1990 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 8, 1990 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 14, 1990 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 7, 1990 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 27, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 8, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |