Drawing for FRUTTA-FRESCA

USPTO serial 74032585

FRUTTA-FRESCA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
EVANKO, PATRICIA MALESARDI
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FRUTTA-FRESCA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Stephen Grubb

STE 20615840 VENTURA BLVDENCINO, CA 91436-2962

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
031fresh deciduous fruitsABANDONEDMay 26, 1991

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 26, 1997ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 26, 1997EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 26, 1997EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Apr 6, 1995CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Mar 9, 1995EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jul 21, 1994CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 5, 1994UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 14, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 12, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 27, 1993CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 25, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 11, 1993CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 7, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 16, 1992CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 1, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 21, 1992SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jul 10, 1992IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Mar 24, 1992NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 31, 1991PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 29, 1991NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 22, 1991CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 8, 1991CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 22, 1991DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 1, 1991CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 22, 1990CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 14, 1990DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance