USPTO serial 74033097
MASTERVIEW
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHARPER JR, SAM
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MASTERVIEW?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William C. Cahill
WILLIAM C CAHILL CAHILL, SUTTON & THOMAS155 PARK ONE2141 E HIGHLAND AVEPHOENIX, AZ 85016Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | aluminum doors and windows | ABANDONED | Jan 15, 1990 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 22, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 17, 1992 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 16, 1992 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 15, 1992 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| May 4, 1992 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 27, 1991 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 1991 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 29, 1991 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 19, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 12, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 5, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |