USPTO serial 74033239
KEYWELL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BRUCE, MARY FRANCES
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with KEYWELL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Edward M. Prince
EDWARD M PRINCE CUSHMAN, DARBY & CUSHMAN1615 L ST N WWASHINGTON, DC 20036-5601UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | automatic lighting switch with infrared control sensor; wireless stereo earphones; cordless pocket phones; wireless communication adapters for data processing systems; burglar alarms; wireless printer adapters; and remote controllers | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 28, 1992 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 5, 1992 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 27, 1991 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 17, 1991 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 31, 1991 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 29, 1991 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 27, 1991 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 26, 1991 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 27, 1990 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 4, 1990 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 9, 1990 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 6, 1990 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 15, 1990 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |