Drawing for LILI MARLENE'S AVIATORS PUB & RESTAURANT

USPTO serial 74033323

LILI MARLENE'S AVIATORS PUB & RESTAURANT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MELTZER, ELEANOR
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LILI MARLENE'S AVIATORS PUB & RESTAURANT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Nora E. Garrote

NORA E GARROTE PIPER & MARBURY1200 19TH ST N WWASHINGTON, DC 20036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041entertainment services, namely musical performances rendered by musical groupsABANDONED—
042restaurant services and retail novelty and souvenir store servicesABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 17, 1992EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 30, 1992ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 30, 1992EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Jun 3, 1992CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Oct 16, 1991CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Sep 18, 1991JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Sep 18, 1991EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
May 29, 1991CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 20, 1991CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 21, 1990CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 19, 1990DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 19, 1990DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 14, 1990CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 12, 1990CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 14, 1990DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance