USPTO serial 74033379
CAPSY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CAPSY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard A. Killworth
B JOSEPH SCHAEFF KILLWORTH, GOTTMAN, HAGAN & SCHAEFFONE DAYTON CTRONE S MAIN ST STE 500DAYTON, OH 45402-2023Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer programs for use in connection with positioning systems used in the construction field | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SPECTRA-PHYSICS LASERPLANE, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Spectra-Physics, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Spectra-Physics, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named CAPSY
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 31, 1995 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 10, 1994 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 29, 1994 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 19, 1994 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 19, 1994 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 30, 1994 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 30, 1994 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 24, 1993 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 30, 1993 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 30, 1993 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 21, 1992 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 18, 1992 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 19, 1991 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 17, 1991 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Feb 19, 1991 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 23, 1990 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 22, 1990 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 25, 1990 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 1, 1990 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 12, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |