Drawing for HARVEY NICHOLS

USPTO serial 74033401

HARVEY NICHOLS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RUPP, TERRY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HARVEY NICHOLS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Anna C. Silva

ANNA C SILVA TOWNSEND AND TOWNSEND KHOURIE AND CREWTWENTIETH FL STEUART ST TWRONE MARKET PLZSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
008knives, forks and spoons made of precious metal, alloys of precious metal, coated with precious metal, and coated with alloys of precious metalABANDONED—
014jewelry, cufflinks, tie pins; precious and semi precious stones; ashtrays, boxes, trays, buckles, candle rings, candle sticks, cigar and cigarette cases, cigarette holders, non-electric coffee pots, tea pots and coffee and tea services, cups, dishes, goblets, household utensils, jewel cases, napkin holders and rings, pen holders, powder compacts, salt cellars and shakers, thread, hollow ware; namely, bowls, plates, pots and vases, all of precious metals; copper non-monetary tokens; statues, ornaments and works of art of precious metal; horological and chronometric apparatus; namely, watches, clocks and chronometers and parts thereforABANDONED—
018leather, imitation leather, and goods made of these materials; namely, bags; namely, travelling bags, duffel bags, tote bags, shoulder bags, suit cases and brief cases, document cases for carrying sheet music, attache cases, credit and business card cases, brief case-type portfolios, hat boxes for travel, leashes, luggage and handbag straps, wallets, pouches, purses, riding saddles, travelling trunks, umbrella covers, valises, and parts therefor; trunks, suitcases, wallets, umbrellas, parasols, purses not of precious metals, saddle cloths, beach bags, school bags, sling bags worn on the body for carrying infantsABANDONED—
025articles of clothing for men, women, and children; namely, fur coats and stoles; footwear; namely, boots, shoes, slippers, and sandals, belts; scarves; headwear; namely, hats and head scarves; pants; robes; bathing suits and trunks; beachwear; boas; lingerie; suspenders; coats; dressing gowns; dresses; garters; gloves; mittens; hosiery; jackets; jerseys; jumpers; layettes; neckties; overalls; paper clothing; namely, women's disposable briefs, and pullovers; pajamas; robes; sashes; shawls; shirts; socks; skirts; smocks; stockings; sweatsuits; underwear; sweaters; tights; trousers; veils; vests; waistcoats and waterproof clothing; namely, mackintoshes; rain coats; sou-westers; galoshes, and oilskin coats, oilskin jackets, oilskin vests, oilskin capes, oilskin trousers, oilskin hats, beltsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 3, 1995ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 7, 1995EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Feb 28, 1995EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Sep 20, 1994EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Aug 10, 1994EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
May 10, 1994EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Feb 25, 1994EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Oct 20, 1993EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 1, 1993EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 2, 1993NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 8, 1992PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 6, 1992NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 24, 1992CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 22, 1992CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jul 30, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 3, 1992CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 25, 1991CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 17, 1991CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 26, 1991CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 20, 1991CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 21, 1990CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 3, 1990DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 26, 1990CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 6, 1990DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance