USPTO serial 74033664
ACCS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- O LEAR, JANICE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ACCS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Hokkaido Pipeline Industrial Co., Ltd.
Chuo-ku, Sapporo City, Hokkaido, JP
Other trademarks owned by Hokkaido Pipeline Industrial Co., Ltd.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Rocco S. Barrese
ROCCO S BARRESE DILWORTH & BARRESE333 EARLE OVINGTON BLVDUNIONDALE, NY 11553UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | machine and machine tools, namely suction power cleaning machine and appurtenant equipment for removing layers of sprayed asbestos | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 31, 1992 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 1992 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 26, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 26, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 7, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |