Drawing for MINCEP: MINNESOTA'S COMPREHENSIVE EPILEPSY PROGRAM

USPTO serial 74033902

MINCEP: MINNESOTA'S COMPREHENSIVE EPILEPSY PROGRAM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KING, CHRISTINA B
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MINCEP: MINNESOTA'S COMPREHENSIVE EPILEPSY PROGRAM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Charles A. Mays

CHARLES A MAYS LEONARD, ST AND DEINARD150 S FIFTH STSTE 2300MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041educational services in the nature of programs and workshops to increase awareness about epilepsy and to inform about diagnosis and treatment of epilepsyABANDONEDSep 24, 1989
042health care services and medical research services in the field of epilepsyABANDONEDSep 24, 1989

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 15, 1990ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Nov 15, 1990ZZZZALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Nov 15, 1990DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 31, 1990ZZZZALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Oct 22, 1990NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 23, 1990CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 27, 1990CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 19, 1990DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance