Drawing for RANDY MACHO KING SAVAGE

USPTO serial 74033986

RANDY MACHO KING SAVAGE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BUSH, KAREN K
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with RANDY MACHO KING SAVAGE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Margaux E. Levy

MARGAUX E LEVY TITAN SPORTS, INC1055 SUMMER STSTAMFORD, CT 06905UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016PHOTOGRAPHS AND POSTERSABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 2, 1992PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Feb 3, 1992EX2MSOU EXTENSION 2 DENIAL LETTER MAILED—
Feb 3, 1992EX2DSOU EXTENSION 2 DENIAL LETTER PREPARED—
Jan 30, 1992ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 16, 1991EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jul 12, 1991EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 5, 1991EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 29, 1991NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 6, 1990PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 6, 1990NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 8, 1990CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 8, 1990CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jun 27, 1990CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 14, 1990DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance