USPTO serial 74034841
THE EAST INDIA COMPANY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EVANKO, PATRICIA MALESARDI
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with THE EAST INDIA COMPANY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Hullavington Wiltshire SN14 6DU, GB
Hullavington Wiltshire SN14 6DU, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Louis Stevenson
LOUIS STEVENSON STEVENSON & SCHULMAN15 STATION RDREADING BERKS, ENG RG1 1LGUNITED KINGDOMGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | distilled spirits, namely gin, whiskey, rum and vodka; and wine | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 19, 1996 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 19, 1996 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 19, 1996 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 6, 1996 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 10, 1995 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 13, 1995 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 12, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 21, 1995 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 21, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 13, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 14, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 4, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 9, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 8, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 23, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 10, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 19, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 1, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 23, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 27, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 21, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |