USPTO serial 74034917
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mary Jo Earle
MARY JO EARLE BIRD & SKIBELL, PC600 METROPOLITAN SAVINGS TWR5944 LUTHER LNDALLAS, TX 75225| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | abortion and gynecological services | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 1, 1992 | PCDE | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DENIED | — |
| Mar 9, 1992 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 30, 1992 | ABN7 | ABANDONMENT - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT | — |
| Jan 30, 1992 | EX1D | SOU EXTENSION 1 DENIAL LETTER PREPARED | — |
| Dec 23, 1991 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 23, 1991 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 25, 1991 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 2, 1991 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 1, 1991 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 12, 1990 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 5, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 30, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 23, 1990 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 28, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |