USPTO serial 74035762
JAPAN CLUB
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- REIHNER, DAVID
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with JAPAN CLUB?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Charles M. Marmelstein
CHARLES M MARMELSTEIN ARMSTRONG, NIKAIDO, MARMELSTEIN, ET ALSTE 1000, 1725 K ST N WWASHINGTON, DC 20006UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | accounting services | ABANDONED | — |
| 039 | travel agency services | ABANDONED | — |
| 041 | educational services namely, conducting forums, lectures and meetings concerning business, politics, economics, science, culture, art and other topics of interest | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | restaurant and hotel services and hotel reservation services and tax consulting services | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 4, 1992 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Apr 2, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 11, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 1, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 3, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 31, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 31, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 23, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 20, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |