USPTO serial 74036237
NISSIN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STINE, DAVID
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NISSIN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert G. McMorrow
ROBERT G MCMORROW SUGHRUE, MION, ZINN, MACPEAK & SEAS2100 PENNSYLVANIA AVE N WWASHINGTON, DC 20037UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | LABORATORY EQUIPMENT, NAMELY thin film depositor AND fine etcher and ion implanter | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 28, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 26, 1999 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 19, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 15, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 11, 1998 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 21, 1996 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 7, 1995 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 8, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 18, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 13, 1994 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 7, 1993 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 14, 1992 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 5, 1991 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 27, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 21, 1990 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 31, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 2, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |