USPTO serial 74036312
REGATTA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with REGATTA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Steven M. Gerber
STEVEN M GERBER1370 BROADWAYNEW YORK, NY 10018UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | namely perfume, cologne, toilet water, after shave lotion, cosmetics, namely skin moisturizers and cleansers, hair conditioners and gels, hand cream, face cream, body gels and bath gels | ABANDONED | — |
| 009 | namely sunglasses and optical frames | ABANDONED | — |
| 025 | namely men's women's and children's jumpsuits, rompers, shorts, shirts, sweaters, sweatshirts, sweat shorts, jogging suits, sportcoats, blazers, outerwear, namely coasts and jackets vests, t-shirts, overalls, swimsuits, hats, socks, scarves, gloves, robes, and footwear; and women's and girls' pants, trousers, jeans, slacks, blouses, knit tops, jackets, dresses, hosiery, panty hose, tights, stockings, leotards, sleepwear, underwear briefs and tops, sting bikinis, tank tops, bras and panties | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 17, 1993 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 13, 1993 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 21, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 18, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 20, 1992 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jul 24, 1992 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 5, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 28, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 10, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 2, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 6, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |