USPTO serial 74037523
ULTRABIND
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COHEN, JEFFREY R.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ULTRABIND?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Donald J. Pochopien
DONALD J POCHOPIEN MCANDREWS, HELD & MALLOY, LTDNORTHWESTERN ATRIUM CTR34TH FL 500 W MADISON STCHICAGO, IL 60606Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | HOT-MELT ADHESIVE COMPOSITION FOR BINDING BOOKS, LABELS TO BOTTLES, AND LAYERS THAT FORMULATE A DISPOSABLE DIAPER | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by APEX ADHESIVES COMPANY
- Other trademarks owned by North American Adhesives, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by North American Adhesives, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Similar marks named ULTRABIND
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 11, 1993 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 6, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 25, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 24, 1992 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 24, 1992 | EX2M | SOU EXTENSION 2 DENIAL LETTER MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 1992 | EX2D | SOU EXTENSION 2 DENIAL LETTER PREPARED | — |
| Dec 16, 1991 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 16, 1991 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 24, 1991 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 16, 1991 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 18, 1990 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 25, 1990 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 25, 1990 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 25, 1990 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 18, 1990 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |