USPTO serial 74037887
TARSUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GLYNN, GERALD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TARSUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Donald R. Fraser
DONALD R FRASER MARSHALL & MELHORNFOUR SEAGATE, FOURTH FLTOLEDO, OH 43604UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | electronic apparatus and instruments, all for the processing, storage, retrieval, transmission, display, input, output and printout of data; computers, computer terminals, computer keyboards, and printers for use therewith; measuring and testing apparatus and instruments; video display units; floppy disc driving apparatus; modems; apparatus and instruments, all for stimulating and analyzing protocol; control apparatus for all the aforesaid goods; cards, discs, tapes and wires, and microchips and electronics circuits all for the recordal of data; parts therefor; and computer programs for use in the fields of management and auditing | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 31, 1992 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 4, 1992 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 4, 1992 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 6, 1992 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 27, 1991 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 26, 1991 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 29, 1991 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 2, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 29, 1991 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 17, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 13, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |