USPTO serial 74038415
DR. MARTENS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 9, 1996
- Examiner
- RUPP, TERRY
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with DR. MARTENS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
D-8000 Munchen 60, DE
DR MARTENS INTERNATIONAL TRADING GMBH
Gräfelfing, DE
Other trademarks owned by DR MARTENS INTERNATIONAL TRADING GMBH
"DR. MARTENS" INTERNATIONAL TRADING GMBH HAIDELWEG 20
D-81241 MUNICH, DE
Other trademarks owned by "DR. MARTENS" INTERNATIONAL TRADING GMBH HAIDELWEG 20
D-8000 Munchen 60, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John C. Baum
John C. Baum Pirkey Barber PLLC1801 East 6th Street, Suite 300Austin, TX 78702United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | socks [ , woven and knitted clothing, namely jeans and T-shirts ] | ACTIVE | Sep 22, 1993 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Dr. Ing. Funck GmbH & Co. KG
- Other trademarks owned by DR MARTENS INTERNATIONAL TRADING GMBH
- Other trademarks owned by "DR. MARTENS" INTERNATIONAL TRADING GMBH HAIDELWEG 20
- Other trademarks owned by Dr. Ing. Funck GmbH & Co. KG
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named DR. MARTENS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 29, 2026 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 29, 2026 | RNL3 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (THIRD RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| May 29, 2026 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| May 29, 2026 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 24, 2026 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 9, 2025 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2022 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Apr 16, 2022 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 16, 2022 | EWOR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL AS DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 16, 2022 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 16, 2022 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 16, 2022 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 18, 2016 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2016 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Mar 18, 2016 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Mar 18, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 12, 2016 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 15, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 26, 2006 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jun 26, 2006 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jun 21, 2006 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 27, 2006 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2006 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| May 23, 2002 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Mar 27, 2002 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 9, 1996 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 20, 1995 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 10, 1995 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 17, 1995 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 16, 1994 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 18, 1994 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 16, 1994 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 10, 1994 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 13, 1993 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 16, 1993 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 23, 1993 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 15, 1993 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 3, 1992 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 3, 1992 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 1, 1992 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 20, 1992 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 20, 1992 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 21, 1992 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 29, 1991 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 27, 1991 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 11, 1991 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 27, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 12, 1991 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 9, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 20, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 9, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 17, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 14, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |