Drawing for SNOB

USPTO serial 74038654

SNOB

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MICHOS, LESLIE BISHOP
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SNOB?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

William R. Hinds

WILLIAM R HINDS727 TWENTY-THIRD ST SARLINGTON, VA 22202UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016boxes and packagings of paper or cardboard; paper for writing or drawing or painting; document files; exercise books; diaries; calendars; appointment books; printed matter, namely, commercial leaflets, brochures and printed advertisements, the subject matter of which is fashion, cosmetics and toiletries, travel and travel accessories, food and beverages, art, arts and crafts, entertainment and/or classified directories; address books, baby books, children's books, cookbooks, copy books, data books, educational books, engagement books, guest books, memorandum books, notebooks, picture books, scrap books, phone number books, wedding books, sketch books, and novels; newspapers and magazines, namely fashion periodicals, booklets and catalogs; maps; invitation cards and visiting cards; post cards; photographs; paintings; pictures; tracing paper; patterns; envelopes; stickers; pens and pencils, artists' pencils, pencil cases, pencil sharpeners, erasers, inks and bottles of ink, chalk for drawing; ungraduated rulers; glue; staplers; letter openers; paper cutters; sealing stamps; blotting paper and blotting pads; printing blocks; printers' type; and playing cardsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 26, 1996ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 25, 1995NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 2, 1995PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 31, 1995NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 10, 1992CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 8, 1992CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Aug 25, 1992JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Mar 27, 1992EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Aug 13, 1991CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 25, 1991CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 7, 1990CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 25, 1990DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 13, 1990DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance