Drawing for WAVEWALKER

USPTO serial 74038719

WAVEWALKER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MOORHEAD CORA ANN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WAVEWALKER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Neil F. Martin

NEIL F MARTIN BROWN, MARTIN, HALLER & MCCLAIN110 W "C" STSTE 1300SAN DIEGO, CA 92101

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028directional control fins for use in body surfing and bodyboarding, skateboards and snowboards, planing water sports equipment, namely, body boards, surf boards, knee boards, surf skis, sail boards, water skis and skim boards; BOARD GAMES AND BOARD-TYPE GAMES INCLUDING THOSE WITH A FABRIC PLAYING SURFACEABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 6, 1991ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Oct 30, 1990PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 29, 1990NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 11, 1990CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 30, 1990CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 3, 1990DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 29, 1990CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance