USPTO serial 74039211
SCENTEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MICHOS, JOHN E
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SCENTEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jennifer A. Dunner
HOWARD B ROCKMAN WELSH & KATZ, LTDSTE 1625135 LASALLE STCHICAGO, IL 60603Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | scented fragrance products; namely, potpourri, room scenting fragrance sprays, incense sticks, and cones, and essential oils for scenting the air | ABANDONED | — |
| 004 | log burning potpourri and scented candles | ABANDONED | — |
| 005 | room deodorizing preparations, air fresheners, air freshening fragrance cones, and air purifying preparations and oils | ABANDONED | — |
| 011 | domestic electric appliances; namely, heating pots for incense and potpourri | ABANDONED | — |
| 016 | kit consisting primarily of wrapping paper, labels and tape for wrapping packages | ABANDONED | — |
| 018 | back packs, hip packs, and canvas bags for travel | ABANDONED | — |
| 021 | non-electric heating pots and containers for incense and potpourri | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SCENTEX, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by SCENTEX, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 004
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Similar marks named SCENTEX
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 23, 1993 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Jun 22, 1993 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Mar 10, 1993 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Jan 6, 1993 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 25, 1992 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 24, 1991 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 1, 1991 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 30, 1991 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 26, 1991 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 17, 1991 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 15, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 16, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 30, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |