Drawing for DOUBLE FRUIT

USPTO serial 74039749

DOUBLE FRUIT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LEETZOW, KAREN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DOUBLE FRUIT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ROBERT V VICKERS

TWENTIETH FL TERMINAL TWRCLEVELAND, OH 44113UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029jams and marmalades; fruit compotesABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 7, 1997ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Oct 7, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 26, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 16, 1997CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jul 2, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 1, 1996CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Oct 12, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 14, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 31, 1994CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Apr 25, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 24, 1994CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Nov 24, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 24, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 23, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 3, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 19, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 26, 1993CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Feb 22, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 10, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 17, 1992CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
May 21, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 16, 1991CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Nov 15, 1991CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 5, 1991CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jun 3, 1991UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 29, 1990CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 5, 1990CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 29, 1990DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 16, 1990DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance