USPTO serial 74040063
RAD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MELTZER, ELEANOR
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RAD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Tuckerstown, BM
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Marvin N. Benn
MARVIN N BENN HAMMAN & BENN25 E WASHINGTON STSTE 600CHICAGO, IL 60602Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | providing lectures, seminars and training in the field of computers, particularly in the areas of information technology, software applications, data bases, teleprocessing, information engineering, telecommunications, systems development and management, and the use of development life cycles, such as, case tools, high-speed, joint and rapid application development, and new approaches in the involvement of personnel and management | ABANDONED | Dec 12, 1989 |
| 042 | consulting services in the field of computers, particularly in the areas of information technology, software applications, data bases, teleprocessing, information engineering, telecommunications, systems development and management, and the use of development life cycles, such as, case tools, high-speed, joint and rapid application development, and new approaches in the involvement of personnel and management | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 1, 1995 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 19, 1995 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 19, 1995 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Dec 6, 1994 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 1994 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 28, 1992 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 1992 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 16, 1991 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Nov 19, 1991 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 29, 1991 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 22, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 14, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 24, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 24, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 3, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |