USPTO serial 74040559
SNACKABLES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PRICE, JERRY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SNACKABLES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ethan Horwitz
ETHAN HORWITZ DARBY & DARBY PC805 THIRD AVE 27TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | packaged combinations of meat or poultry and cheese, crackers, and desserts, in the nature of candy, trail mix, brownies, chocolate bars, bakery goods or pudding | ABANDONED | — |
| 030 | packaged combinations of desserts in the nature of candy, trail mix, brownies, chocolate bars, bakery goods or pudding, and cheese, crackers, meat or poultry | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by OSCAR MAYER FOODS CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by OSCAR MAYER FOODS CORPORATION
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named SNACKABLES
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 23, 1996 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 22, 1995 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 20, 1995 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 20, 1995 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 12, 1993 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 10, 1993 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 9, 1993 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 10, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 14, 1993 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 13, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 13, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 19, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |