USPTO serial 74041132
MICKY'S MINIS FLORA EXPRESS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 1637855Status 900
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 12, 1991
- Examiner
- TAYLOR, CRAIG
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MICKY'S MINIS FLORA EXPRESS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Micky's Mini-Flora Express, Ltd.
St. Louis, MO
Micky's Mini-Flora Express, Ltd.
St. Louis, MO
Micky's Mini-Flora Express, Ltd.
St. Louis, MO
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William D. O'Neill
William D. O'Neill SENNIGER POWERS LLP100 NORTH BROADWAY17TH FLOORST. LOUIS, MO 63102Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 039 | delivery of plants by truck and plane | EXPIRED | Jan 17, 1990 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Micky's Mini-Flora Express, Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Micky's Mini-Flora Express, Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Micky's Mini-Flora Express, Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Similar marks named MICKY'S MINIS FLORA EXPRESS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 1, 2011 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Nov 1, 2011 | PRA7 | REGISTERED - SEC. 7 REQUEST ABANDONED | — |
| Mar 8, 2011 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Mar 7, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 23, 2011 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 26, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 25, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 16, 2001 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jun 16, 2001 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Mar 15, 2001 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Mar 21, 1997 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Feb 24, 1997 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Mar 12, 1991 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 18, 1990 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 16, 1990 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 28, 1990 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 21, 1990 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 9, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |