USPTO serial 74041941
BROOKLYN BOTTLING CORP.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BROOKLYN BOTTLING CORP.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jamie Johnson
JAMIE JOHNSON KRAMER, BRUFSKY & CIFELLI, PCP O BOX 59SOUTHPORT, CT 06490UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | bottling services to the order and specification of others | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 14, 1992 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 21, 1992 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 1, 1992 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Feb 21, 1992 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 21, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 20, 1991 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| May 22, 1991 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 25, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 30, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 27, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 13, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 13, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 13, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |