USPTO serial 74042555
ACT ADVANCED CALLING TECHNOLOGIES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MICHOS, LESLIE BISHOP
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ACT ADVANCED CALLING TECHNOLOGIES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John T. McLandrich
JOHN T MCLANDRICH MAZANEC, RASKIN & RYDER CO LPAN SOLON OFFICE COMMONS30670 BAINBRIDGE RDSOLON, OH 44139Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer based telecommunications devices used to telemarket by initiating telephone calls and directing such of the computer placed calls as are answered to live telephone operators | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 4, 1993 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Jan 4, 1993 | PCDE | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DENIED | — |
| Dec 5, 1992 | ABN7 | ABANDONMENT - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT | — |
| Apr 1, 1992 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 3, 1991 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 4, 1991 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 12, 1991 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 8, 1991 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 7, 1990 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 5, 1990 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 23, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 14, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |