Drawing for THE TWINS

USPTO serial 74044224

THE TWINS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MOORHEAD CORA ANN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE TWINS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ronald L. Wanke

RONALD L WANKE JENNER & BLOCKONE IBM PLZCHICAGO, IL 60611UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028DOLLS AND ACCESSORIES THEREFORABANDONEDOct 5, 1990

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 28, 1996ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Mar 5, 1996OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Mar 5, 1996OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Mar 18, 1994OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Aug 4, 1992PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 2, 1992NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 19, 1992IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Oct 26, 1991CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 24, 1991ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Sep 25, 1991IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Sep 25, 1991CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 17, 1991CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 16, 1991DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 9, 1991AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Mar 1, 1991CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 1, 1991IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jan 2, 1991CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Oct 25, 1990CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Sep 25, 1990CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 24, 1990CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 16, 1990CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 27, 1990DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance