USPTO serial 74044663
SALTO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- REIHNER, DAVID
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SALTO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
6236 Eschborn bei Frankfort, DE
6236 Eschborn bei Frankfort, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Charles N. Quinn
CHARLES N QUINN MILLER & QUINN1125 LAND TITLE BLDGPHILADELPHIA, PA 19110UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | printing masters; namely, carriers of glass, plastic, and/or exposed photographic film; namely, transparencies, and transparency negatives bearing alphabets and characters in different fonts for typographic composition, display, and reproduction | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 26, 1995 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 2, 1994 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 2, 1994 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 24, 1993 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 24, 1993 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 13, 1993 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 25, 1993 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 25, 1992 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 2, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 1, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 25, 1991 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 15, 1991 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 14, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 14, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 1, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |