USPTO serial 74045260
YASI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEVINE, HOWARD B
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with YASI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Karen L. Albert
KAREN L ALBERT FISH & NEAVE1251 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10020UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | perfume and cosmetics; namely, eau de cologne, cologne, eau de toilette, toilette, eau de parfum, perfume, bath oil, bath soap, shower gel, scented body shampoo, scented deodorant spray, pre-moistened cosmetic towelettes, bath crystals, milk bath, dusting powder, body lotion, scented body cream, hand lotion, talc, non-medicated skin cleanser, toner, day cream, night cream, eye cream, eye makeup remover, neck cream, masks, lip cream, hand cream, body lotion, body cream, body shampoo, exfoliating cleansing cream, cleansing bar for the body, cream bath, hair shampoo, hair conditioner, deodorant, lipstick, lip gloss, nail polish, eye shadow, and face makeup | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 14, 1994 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 8, 1993 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 12, 1993 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 1, 1993 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 9, 1993 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 13, 1992 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 21, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 19, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 2, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 24, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 23, 1991 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 25, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 21, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 3, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |