USPTO serial 74045640
GARANTIE VAN GOGH ADVOCAAT EIERLIKOR DE ERVEN WED.H.WARNINK HOLLAND
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 1669672Status 713
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 24, 1991
- Examiner
- GRAY, CAROLYN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GARANTIE VAN GOGH ADVOCAAT EIERLIKOR DE ERVEN WED.H.WARNINK HOLLAND?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
3241 LK Middelharnis, NL
3241 LK Middelharnis, NL
3241 LK Middelharnis, NL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
H. John Campaign
H JOHN CAMPAIGN PC GRAHAM CAMPAIGN PC36 W 44TH STNEW YORK, NY 10036-8178UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | alcoholic beverages; namely, egg liqueur | SECTION 18 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ERVEN WARNINK B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by ERVEN WARNINK B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by ERVEN WARNINK B.V.
- Other trademarks in Class 033
- Similar marks named GARANTIE VAN GOGH ADVOCAAT EIERLIKOR DE ERVEN WED.H.WARNINK HOLLAND
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 22, 2001 | C18. | CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL | — |
| Feb 22, 2001 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 29, 2000 | CANG | CANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 12, 2000 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 31, 1997 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Jan 7, 1997 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Dec 24, 1991 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 1, 1991 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 30, 1991 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 25, 1991 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 11, 1991 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 5, 1991 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 27, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 8, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 21, 1990 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 24, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 14, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 16, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |