USPTO serial 74046528
RUPERT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GOLD, BARBARA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RUPERT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
London SE1 9UX, GB
London SE1 9UX, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Arne I. Fors
ARNE I FORS GOWLING, STRATHY & HENDERSONSTE 4900, COMMERCE COURT WTORONTO, ON M5L 1J3CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | toys, games and playthings; namely, board games, card games, dolls, puppets, rattles, teething rings, infant and preschool foam rubber toys, mobiles for children, jigsaw puzzles, manipulative puzzles, three dimensional puzzles, toy construction blocks, sports balls, balloons, ride-on toys, infant action crib toys, pyramid ring and/or building toys, toy model train sets, toy model racing car sets, toy playhouses, activity or hobby kits; namely, toy weaving looms, toy needlecraft kits, toy woodcraft kits, hand-held unit for playing electronic games, computer game software, pull toys, inflatable bath and ride-on toys, beach toys; namely, inflatable flotation toys, toy bucket and shovel sets, and toy sand molds, child's toy accessory; namely, plastic overlays used for tracing upon a toy screen, lacing cards, transfer games composed of stick-on pieces and a mounting board, yo-yos, toy blackboards, mechanical toys; namely, toy figures and toy vehicles, miniature parlor games, wind-up toys, and bath toys | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 3, 1995 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Jul 19, 1994 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Feb 8, 1994 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 7, 1993 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 30, 1993 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 25, 1993 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 18, 1993 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 5, 1993 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 6, 1992 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 14, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 12, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 11, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 7, 1992 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 26, 1991 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 28, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 11, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 13, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 31, 1991 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Aug 16, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 8, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |