USPTO serial 74046679
DAINICHI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BRUCE, MARY FRANCES
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DAINICHI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Dainichi Consumer Electronics Ltd.
Greenford, Middlesex, GB
Other trademarks owned by Dainichi Consumer Electronics Ltd.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Herbert Dubno
HERBERT DUBNO KARL F ROSS, PC5676 RIVERDALE AVEBOX 900NEW YORK, NY 10471Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | electrical and electronic apparatus and instruments, namely, stereo systems and their components, such as, audio cassette tape decks, turntables, amplifiers, speakers, compact disc decks, tuning decks; audio cassette recorders, phonographs, compact disk players, televisions, telephones; video cassette recorders; video cassette players; video cameras; radios; clock radios; electric steam irons; electric curling irons, electric hair crimpers, electrically heated curlers | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 29, 1992 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 14, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 28, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |