Drawing for GRAPHIC EVIDENCE

USPTO serial 74047388

GRAPHIC EVIDENCE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FOSTER, STEVEN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GRAPHIC EVIDENCE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Patricia A. De Meyere

PARTICIA A DE MEYERE SHEA & GOULD1251 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10020-1193UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041creating charts, graphs, illustrations, and scale models for use as exhibits in legal preceedings, and consulting services in connection therewithABANDONEDJul 1, 1977
042production of video presentatios and computer-generated animation for use as exhibits in legal preceedings, and consulting services in connection therewithABANDONEDJul 1, 1977

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 15, 1994EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 8, 1994ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 6, 1994EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Jul 14, 1993CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
May 19, 1993EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jan 22, 1993CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Dec 10, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 23, 1992CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 15, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 11, 1991CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 3, 1991CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 15, 1991CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 26, 1991CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 27, 1990CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 7, 1990DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 24, 1990DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance